Spreadsheet lineage and versioning
Which spreadsheet is the "real" one, who last changed it, and whether that's traceable at all.
Controls
Surface spreadsheet dependency, approval gaps, undocumented judgment, evidence collection effort and single-owner risk.
Guided intake today · Start without a connection
Where risk hides
Guided intake asks about each of these — you don't need a system connection to get a directional read.
Which spreadsheet is the "real" one, who last changed it, and whether that's traceable at all.
Whether an approval actually happened is provable, not just assumed because a task is marked done.
How much manual effort it takes to answer "who can touch this system" when someone asks.
How long it takes to pull evidence for an audit request, and how much of it is manual reconstruction.
Whether exceptions to a stated policy are logged and reviewed, or just quietly allowed.
Whether critical control steps have a documented backup owner, or depend on one person being available.
Confidence, capped honestly
A questionnaire-only finding is capped at low confidence by design — wording never implies more certainty than the evidence supports.
Based on your reported process, a key reconciliation lives in a personal spreadsheet with no version history or documented backup owner.
Illustrative — not a customer result. Guided-intake-only findings are capped at low confidence; verified findings require reviewing the actual spreadsheet and control evidence, gathered under the Finance Operations Assessment.
Honest scope
Four places finance friction hides
Close, Cash and Clarity use the same evidence model. Start wherever the pain is loudest.
Start with controls
Start a Controls review today, or email us to discuss early access and the Finance Operations Assessment.