Serial dependencies
Tasks that wait in line for each other even though several of them could run in parallel with the right handoff.
Close
Map the dependencies, manual journals, reconciliations, spreadsheet handoffs and review bottlenecks behind your period-end timeline — and see which ones are worth fixing first.
Start without a connection · Evidence-backed · No rip-and-replace
Rarely just one thing
A slow close is usually six small problems compounding, not one big one. FlyCFO maps them individually so you know which to fix first.
Tasks that wait in line for each other even though several of them could run in parallel with the right handoff.
Upstream teams or systems deliver what finance needs late, and the whole close schedule absorbs the delay.
The same accruals, reclasses and imports built by hand, close after close, with no reliable audit trail.
Reconciliation work sits idle until "perfect" data arrives, instead of starting on what's already available.
A single reviewer becomes the bottleneck — and the key-person risk — for the whole close.
A checklist shows which tasks are marked done — not the evidence behind them, or which ones hit an exception.
No connection required to start
Every evidence type below strengthens the read on your close. None of them are required — you can start with structured questions alone.
Whatever you already run the close from, in whatever format it exists today.
An export from a close-management tool or project tracker, if you keep one.
A list of what gets reconciled each period, and by whom.
Any written runbook, SOP or onboarding note describing how the close is actually performed.
Structured answers about your close — always accepted, always the starting point.
A supported accounting/ERP connection with minimum read-only scopes, only where genuinely available.
Evidence before reliance
Every finding is graded by the evidence behind it and states a range, not a single invented number. This is a demonstration, not a customer result.
Review work is concentrated with one person and begins only after all preparers finish, creating a serial dependency.
Recommended next step: validate review criteria, split exception review from standard review, and automate evidence collection before changing approvals. Illustrative example — not a customer result or industry benchmark.
Honest scope
It's a diagnostic, not a substitute for judgment. It tells you where to look, not what to decide.
Four places finance friction hides
Cash, Clarity and Controls use the same evidence model. Start wherever the pain is loudest.
Find the repeated touches and handoff gaps delaying cash — billing, collections, disputes and cash application.
Find the manual work hiding inside management and board reporting — assembly, definitions and last-mile slides.
Find fragile spreadsheets, approval gaps and single-owner risk before they become audit or continuity problems.
Start with Close
Run the Close Flight Check, or get your free Close Health Score first — either way, no connection is required to start.