Close

See what is making your close take longer than it should.

Map the dependencies, manual journals, reconciliations, spreadsheet handoffs and review bottlenecks behind your period-end timeline — and see which ones are worth fixing first.

Start without a connection · Evidence-backed · No rip-and-replace

Rarely just one thing

Close delays rarely come from one task

A slow close is usually six small problems compounding, not one big one. FlyCFO maps them individually so you know which to fix first.

01

Serial dependencies

Tasks that wait in line for each other even though several of them could run in parallel with the right handoff.

02

Late inputs

Upstream teams or systems deliver what finance needs late, and the whole close schedule absorbs the delay.

03

Repeated manual journals

The same accruals, reclasses and imports built by hand, close after close, with no reliable audit trail.

04

Reconciliations that wait

Reconciliation work sits idle until "perfect" data arrives, instead of starting on what's already available.

05

Review concentrated with one person

A single reviewer becomes the bottleneck — and the key-person risk — for the whole close.

06

Checklists without evidence

A checklist shows which tasks are marked done — not the evidence behind them, or which ones hit an exception.

No connection required to start

Use the evidence you already have

Every evidence type below strengthens the read on your close. None of them are required — you can start with structured questions alone.

01

Close checklist or calendar

Whatever you already run the close from, in whatever format it exists today.

02

Task export

An export from a close-management tool or project tracker, if you keep one.

03

Reconciliation inventory

A list of what gets reconciled each period, and by whom.

04

Process document

Any written runbook, SOP or onboarding note describing how the close is actually performed.

05

Questionnaire responses

Structured answers about your close — always accepted, always the starting point.

06

Supported read-only data

A supported accounting/ERP connection with minimum read-only scopes, only where genuinely available.

Evidence before reliance

What a Close finding actually looks like

Every finding is graded by the evidence behind it and states a range, not a single invented number. This is a demonstration, not a customer result.

Demonstration finding Illustrative

Account reconciliation review is a serial bottleneck

Review work is concentrated with one person and begins only after all preparers finish, creating a serial dependency.

Observed stepQuantifiedValidation needed
Process
Account reconciliation review
Evidence
Reported workflow + checklist
Estimated impact
18–32 hrs / close
Confidence
Medium
Complexity
Low to medium
Next step
Validate review criteria

Recommended next step: validate review criteria, split exception review from standard review, and automate evidence collection before changing approvals. Illustrative example — not a customer result or industry benchmark.

Honest scope

What the Close Flight Check can — and can't — tell you

It's a diagnostic, not a substitute for judgment. It tells you where to look, not what to decide.

What it can tell you
  • Where the close is serial rather than parallel
  • Where ownership creates key-person risk
  • Which tasks are candidates for evidence collection, orchestration, or automation
  • Which findings need validation before a change
What it cannot tell you automatically
  • Whether accounting judgment is correct
  • Whether a control should be removed
  • Whether every manual task should be automated
  • A guaranteed savings amount from incomplete evidence

Start with Close

Find the first thing worth fixing in your close.

Run the Close Flight Check, or get your free Close Health Score first — either way, no connection is required to start.