Findings
A ranked teardown of where AP/AR loses time and cash.
Accounts payable & receivable automation
Manual invoice capture, GL coding, three-way matching, approvals and collections quietly consume finance hours and delay cash. FlyCFO scores where AP/AR leaks the most, deploys one automation on the systems you already use, and measures the hours and days-sales-outstanding it returns.
Works with Bill.com, Ramp, Brex, Stripe, QuickBooks, NetSuite and more · No credentials in the score
Is this worth automating
…versus when your AP/AR already runs cleanly on connected tooling.
Start with the flow, not a guess
The free score uses ranges and structure. The paid assessment observes the real AP/AR flow — never asking for passwords or exports up front.
Every AP/AR step gets a classification
These are common AP/AR patterns after review. They illustrate how classification usually works — never a universal promise. Your assessment determines the actual approach for each step.
Swipe to see more →
| AP / AR step | Automation approach | Classification | Typical condition | Verified by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoice capture & data extraction | Automated capture into your AP tool | Automate | Invoice formats are mappable | Field accuracy vs. source invoice |
| GL coding & cost-centre allocation | AI finance skill suggests, human confirms | Assist | Coding rules and history available | Suggested vs. approved coding rate |
| Two- / three-way matching | Automated match + exception queue | Automate | PO and receipt data are accessible | Match rate + exceptions reconciled |
| Approval routing | Rules-based routing with reminders | Assist | Thresholds and approvers defined | Cycle-time before vs. after |
| Collections & dunning | Scheduled, tiered reminders | Redesign | Cadence and tone agreed | DSO and overdue-balance trend |
| Cash application | Automated matching of receipts to invoices | Automate | Remittance data is available | Applied rate + unapplied clean-up |
| Duplicate manual payment tracker | — | Retire | Superseded by connected controls | Owner sign-off to decommission |
| Niche supplier portal, no API | Reviewed before any promise | Resolve | Integration path unverified until reviewed | Integration parity check first |
One price, credited to your build
Board-ready findings on your AP/AR flow, a cited AI finance skill, one deployed automation targeting your biggest bottleneck, and verified hours and cash returned. The fee is credited in full to your automation build.
A ranked teardown of where AP/AR loses time and cash.
Your highest-payback AP or AR step, deployed, tested and managed.
Measured hours returned and DSO impact — not a projection.
Illustrative launch pricing pending commercial validation.
A green run is not the finish line
Anything touching payments or receivables needs its acceptance agreed and tested before it's trusted. At minimum it covers:
Illustrative evidence record — not a customer result.
Questions about AP / AR
No. FlyCFO automates around and between the tools you already use. If your AP tool has a clean API, we build on it rather than replacing it. Niche tools without an API are classified Resolve until we've verified the integration.
Duplicate-payment guards, matching tolerances and approval thresholds are part of the acceptance plan and are tested before go-live — not assumed. Anything the automation can't safely resolve is routed to a person, never paid blindly.
Yes — on the AR side we can automate tiered, scheduled reminders and cash application, then measure the impact on days-sales-outstanding and unapplied cash against your baseline.
Yes. Automation enforces your approval thresholds and separation of duties rather than bypassing them, and every action is logged for audit.
Next step
Prefer to talk it through first? Tell us about your AP/AR flow and a specialist will follow up — or start with the free Close Health Score.
Start with a number
Score your finance ops in three minutes, then decide whether the assessment is worth it.